What belongs to you, but others use it more than you do?



The answer is: Your name.

I might be far from the point, but I’m not a mistake. In fact, I fix yours. What am I?



The answer is: An eraser

Brain pickings my fav news letter

This is the brainpickings.orgweekly digest by Maria Popova. If you missed last week’s edition — Margaret Fuller’s 150-year-old wisdom on what makes a great political leader, a watercolor love letter to mornings, Liz Gilbert reads a favorite poem — you can catch up right here. And if you’re enjoying this newsletter, please consider supporting my labor of love with a donation – each month, I spend hundreds of hours and tremendous resources on it, and every little bit of support helps enormously. If you already donate: THANK YOU.

Georgia O’Keeffe on the Art of Seeing


In her stunning autobiographical reflection on the moment she understood what it means to be an artist, Virginia Woolf beheld the cosmos of connections in a single flower. Decades later, the Nobel-winning physicist Richard Feynman offered a different, complementary lens on the art of seeing through his now-famous monologue known as “Ode to a Flower.”

Before Feynman, before Woolf, another titan of the creative spirit found a powerful metaphor for how we experience the world — how we see it, and how we don’t — in a flower.


Georgia O’Keeffe, Red Canna, 1924 (Georgia O’Keeffe Museum)

“I found that I could say things with colour and shapes that I couldn’t say in any other way things that I had no words for,” Georgia O’Keeffe (November 15, 1887–March 6, 1986) wrote in the foreword to a catalog for an exhibition of her work two decades before she became the first female artist honored with a retrospective at the Museum of Modern Art — a triumph largely predicated on her arresting large-scale paintings of flowers, magnified and abstracted to radiate uncommon emotional intensity haloed by awe. Although art critics consistently insisted that O’Keeffe’s depictions of flowers were her commentary on women’s sexuality, the artist herself resolutely denied these interpretations. For her, they were her commentary on seeing — a magnifying lens for the attention. Painting these close-ups was a way of learning to look, a way of removing the blinders with with we gallop through the world, slowing down, shedding our notions and concepts of things, and taking things in as they really are.


Georgia O’Keeffe by Rufus Holsinger, 1915 (Albert & Shirley Small Special Collections Library)

In a passage originally published in the exhibition catalog An American Place — which also gave us O’Keeffe’s serenade to blue — and later cited in Georgia O’Keeffe: The Poetry of Things (public library), she writes:

2e292385-dc1c-4cfe-b95e-845f6f98c2ec.pngA flower is relatively small. Everyone has many associations with a flower — the idea of flowers. You put out your hand to touch the flower — lean forward to smell it — maybe touch it with your lips almost without thinking — or give it to someone to please them. Still — in a way — nobody sees a flower — really — it is so small — we haven’t time — and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. If I could paint the flower exactly as I see it no one would see what I see because I would paint it small like the flower is small.

So I said to myself — I’ll paint what I see — what the flower is to me but I’ll paint it big and they will be surprised into taking time to look at it — I will make even busy New-Yorkers take time to see what I see of flowers.

Well — I made you take time to look at what I saw and when you took time to really notice my flower, you hung all your own associations with flowers on my flower and you write about my flower as if I think and see what you think and see of the flower — and I don’t.


Georgia O’Keeffe, Grey Lines with Black, Blue and Yellow, 1923 (Georgia O’Keeffe Museum)

Complement with O’Keeffe on setting prioritiessuccess, public opinion, and what it means to be an artist, and her passionate love letters to Alfred Stieglitz, then revisit cognitive scientist Alexandra Horowitz on the art of looking, Annie Dillard on the secret to seeing, philosopher Martin Buber on what a tree can teach us about seeing others as they truly are, John Ruskin on how drawing trains you to see more clearly and live with greater presence, and Emily Dickinson’s astounding herbarium— a forgotten masterpiece of attention at the intersection of poetry and science

Did you know..

Did you know…

… that today is $90 Million Movie Day? In 2001, the first Harry Potter movie, “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone,” set a new three-day opening weekend record for the U.S. by grossing $93.5 million, the first movie to gross more than $90 million in box office receipts in a weekend.


Today’s Inspirational Quote:

“When you are joyful, when you say yes to life and have fun and project positivity all around you, you become a sun in the center of every constellation, and people want to be near you.”

— Shannon L. Alder

Dear BFFFs you astonished me 80128 times! Gratitude! 🙏♥️👌♥️♥️♥️🌺🌺🥀🥀

Thank you BFFFs and registered users, fellow bloggers! You astononisued me. I. 180+ days you liked this blog 80128 times and I am delighted, humbled and grateful for your support, kind messages and Reading / viewing 100484 times in just 6 months. You are Grilling!🙏😁👌♥️♥️♥️♥️ 

This made my day.  Let me now reciprocate and wish you a great week ahead